USSR Market

In this case, the ratio of the balance between these two types of economic relations is directly related both to objective historical conditions of the state of society, and with his socio-political and national characteristics at this stage of development. For example, the predominance of market economic relations can be observed in Europe, and especially in England, during the period 'Beginning of new era' (XVIII – XIX centuries). Within national economies and beyond. Such an economic system adopted to determine how to market on the basis of prevailing, despite the undoubted presence of other forms of economic relations within the economic actors: traditional (household, farming, etc.) and administrative (in-house, corporate, etc.). In contrast, as an example of the predominance of national economy of the administrative relationship type, we can bring the economy of the USSR and other Eastern European states during the 'socialist construction' (XX century)..

However, beyond national economies of these states, or their individual economic actors, as were the participants of market relations at the level of international and global economic processes. At the same time, households and small craft workshops, producing its products and trading them through 'collective farm' markets, were the subjects of traditional economic relations. Patriarchal economic system dominated by a primitive society, but also here obviously was available for the market (tribal and interpersonal exchanges products, mining, etc.) and administrative (collective hunting, berry picking, etc.) relationships. The examples given ("start of a new time 'in England and' socialist construction 'in the USSR) illustrate the periods of development of the societies in which economic system is in state of extreme imbalance, ie in XIX century England there is a rapid growth market relations, and the USSR dominated the administrative economic relations.

Tags:

Comments are closed.

  • « Older Entries
  • Newer Entries »